آموزش و اخلاق در پرستاری

تبیین شاخص های اخلاق تدریس در اموزش علوم پزشکی :یک مطالعه ترکیبی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه آموزش، گروه آموزش پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جهرم، ایران

2 مربی، گروه اخلاق، دانشکه پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جهرم، ایران

3 دانشجوی پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جهرم، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: شاخص های اخلاق در تدریس با ارائه یک الگوی عملی زمینه را جهت رشد و توسعه آن در محیط آموزشی فراهم می آورد و توجه محض به انتقال دانش و حذف بعد تربیت از مسئولیت اساتید را یادآوری می نماید. این مطالعه با هدف  بررسی  اخلاق تدریس از دیدگاه اساتید و دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جهرم در قالب یک مطالعه ترکیبی انجام شد.
روش‌کار: در این پژوهش ترکیبی، در بخش کمی، 100 نفر از دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جهرم با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب شدند. در بخش کیفی نیز 8 نفر از اساتید و 20 نفر از دانشجویان دانشگاه به صورت هدفمند مشارکت داشتند. ابزار پژوهش در بخش کمی، پرسشنامه ای مشتمل بر 35 سوال در یک طیف 5 بخشی بود. تلفیق یافته های کمی و کیفی منجر به استخراج شاخص ها و گویه های پرسشنامه اخلاق در تدریس آموزش علوم پزشکی گردید.
یافته‌ها: در بخش کمی و در بین ابعاد پرسشنامه، بعد اخلاق حرفه ای مدرس نسبت به خود از بالاترین میانگین برخوردار بود که در این حیطه بیشترین میانگین مربوط به منزلت مدرس با میانگین ( 0.92 ± 3.07) بود و بعد از آن مولفه روابط انسانی از مقادیر بیشتری برخوردار بود که بیشترین میانگین مربوط به علاقه و محبت واقعی نسبت به دانشجویان با میانگین (0.92 ± 3.04)بود. در بخش کیفی از مجموع تعداد 74 کد بررسی شده، تعداد 3 تم استخراج گردید که شامل اخلاق فردی، اجتماعی و حرفه ای بودند.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتـایج بـه دست آمده در این پژوهش که از تلفیق دو بخش کمی و کیفی  به دست آمد منجر به ارائه  شاخص ها و گویه هایی جهت بررسی وضعیت اخلاق در تدریس علوم پزشکی شد که در مقایسه با پرسشنامه  های قبل جامعیت بیشتری دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The explanation of ethics in teaching indicators in medical sciences : a mixed study

نویسندگان [English]

  • Leili Mosalanejad 1
  • Mansor Tafvisi 2
  • Mohammad Amin Moradian 3

1 Associated Professor, Medical Education Department, Virtual Center, Jahrom university of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran

2 MSc, Medical Ethic Department, Jahrom university of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran

3 Medical Student, Jahrom university of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: This study aimed to explain the teaching ethics from the viewpoints of Jahrom University of Medical
Sciences professors and students as a mixed method.
Materials and Methods: This is qualitative- quantitative study with mixed approach .In quantitative part, 100 students of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences were selected using stratified random sampling method. In the qualitative part, 20 students and 8 professors participated. The research instrument in the quantitative was reliable and valid questionnaire of professional ethics, consisting of 35 questions in 5 point continuum. In-depth semi-structured interviews were used in the qualitative section by Colizzi analysis. The results of two parts extracted and new indicators and dimension emerged from mixed method
Results: In the aspect of ethic in teaching, the highest mean was related to the personality of the teacher in related
to the recognition of teacher dignity (3.07±_0.92). Another high mean od score was related to interpersonal relationship with higher score in, genuine interest to students (3.04 ±_0.92.The qualitative section of the total of 74 codes examined, 3 themes were selected. Themes included individual, social, and professional ethics. With a total of 11 subthemes identified in the qualitative review.
Conclusion: Results from two qualitative and qualitative parts lead to emerge questioner's items that is comprehensive in content and dimensions than current questionnaire in medical education. This indicator may be used by many researcher in Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ethic
  • Teaching
  • Professionalism
  • Medical Education
  • Mixed Method
1-Assadullahi P, Afshari P. The comparison of tutors’ and students’ opinions in respect to present academic condition. Iran J Med Educ. 2002; 3(2): 5-14. [Persian]. 2-Dadkhah B, Mohammadi AM, Mozafari N,Mohammadnejad S, Molaei B, Dadkhah D. The characteristics of good faculty member based on view points of Ardabil univesity of medical sciences students. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci. 2010;11(4): 44-50. [Persian]. 3. Izadikhah A, Changiz T, Yamani N, Mirshahjafarey I. Developing codes of ethics for clinical medicine educators. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2013;6(1):37-52. [Persian]. 4-SIMPSON, Peter LP. The Eudemian Ethics of Aristotle. Routledge, 2017. 5-Wankat PC, Oreovicz FS. Teaching engineering. Purdue University Press; 2015. 6. Ruiz-Argüelles GJ. A new breed in the teaching of medicine: paid lecturers, trainers or speakers. Acta Haematol. 2016;135(3):191-2. 7-Butts JB, Rich KL. Nursing ethics. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2019 . 8-Walker KF, Thornton JG. Ethics in Medicine. InMedicolegal Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2018 (pp. 3-8). Springer, Cham. 9-Reybold LE, Halx MD. Staging Professional Ethics in Higher Education: a Dramaturgical Analysis of “Doing the Right Thing” in Student Affairs. Innovative Higher Education. 2018 ;43(4):273-87. 10. Davis M. Professional ethics in higher education: An engineering perspective. InHigher Education and Professional Ethics 2018 ,(pp. 59-75). Routledge India. 11. Boon HJ. Explicit ethics education for prospective teachers: An essential precursor for quality teaching–ethics training for pre-service teachers. InHigher Education and Professional Ethics 2018 , (pp. 204-222). Routledge India. 12. Moran D, Edwardson J, Cuneo CN, Tackett S, Aluri J, Kironji A, Cox J, Carroll B, Lie E, Fofana M, Bollinger RC. Development of global health education at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine: a student-driven initiative. Medical education online. 2015;20(1):28632. 13. Mion G, Bonfanti A. Drawing up codes of ethics of higher education institutions: evidence from Italian universities. International Journal of Educational Management. 2019; 33(7) . 14. Peterson R. Outsourced to China: Confucius Institutes and Soft Power in American Higher Education. A Report by the National Association of Scholars. National Association of Scholars. 221 Witherspoon Street 2nd Floor, Princeton, NJ 08542-3215; 2017 . 15-Kazempour Z, Ashrafi Rizi H, Taheri B. The attention rate of librarians in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Isfahan University to professional ethics based on ethical codes of Iranian University librarians. Health Inf Manag. 2011;8(6):795-806. 16-Mosadegh H,Bironi Kashani R,porkarimi J, Abdollahi B. Regarding Professional Ethics Among Professors at Tehran University and Imam Khomeini Institute from Learners Point of. Journal of culture in the Islamic University . 2014;3(9):705-73. 17-Singh A. Ethics for medical educators: an overview and fallacies. Indian journal of psychological medicine. 2010;32(2):83. 18-Mosalanejad L, Parandavar N, Rezaie E. Students’ Experience about the Hidden Curriculum: A Qualitative Study. JRUMS. 2014; 13(2) :111-124. 19-Campbell E. The ethical teacher. McGraw-hill education (UK); 2003 . 20- Buyx AM, Maxwell B, Schöne Seifert B. Challenges of educating for medical professionalism: who should step up to the line? Med Educ. 2008;42(8):758-64. 21-Amrahi A, Soltanzadeh V, Esm Hosseini GhR. Teaching ethics of faculty members situation from the viewpoints of Nursing students. Biomonthly Educ Strateg Med Sci. 2014;7(4):235-40. 22-MirmohammadiMeybodiS.Thecharacteristicsof effective teaching based on viewpoints of Shahid Sadoqi University of MedicalSciences.JMedEduDev. 2013;5(9):52-62. 23-Motallebifard A, Navehebrahim A, Mohsen Zadeh F. Recognizing professional and ethical indicators in University teaching from the perspectives of postgraduate students: A qualitative approach. Ethic Sci Thehnol. 2012;6(4):9-1. 24-Aghakahni N, Sharif F, Sharifnia H et al. Survey of Nursing students’ views regarding professors’ adherence to professional ethics in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, 2010. J Educ Ethics Nurs. 2013;2(3):41-6. 25-Campbell E. The ethics of teaching as a moral profession. Curriculum Inquiry. 2008;38(4):357-85. 26-Farmahini-Farahani M, Behnam-Jam Investigation of compliance with components of education professional ethics in Shahed University faculty members. Ethics in Science and Technology;2012; 7(1): 48-57. (In Persian). 27-Delshad Tehrani M. Lord of trust: Administrative ethics in Nahj-Al-Balaghah. 3th ed. Tehran: Darya Publication.2000. (In Persian).
آموزش و اخلاق در پرستاری
دوره 9، 3-4
مهر 1399
صفحه 86-94