آموزش و اخلاق در پرستاری

یادگیری سیار در آموزش پزشکی و عوامل موثر

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جهرم

2 دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز

چکیده

چکیده
مقدمه: امروزه ابزارهای مبتنی بر فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در همه عرصه های علوم پزشکی به ویژه آموزش نفوذ چشمگیری یافته است. نوپا بودن بهره برداری های هدفمند و طراحی شده از این ابزارها در کشور ما از یک سو و قدمت مقیاس های نشانگر مدل پذیرش فناوری از سوی دیگر؛ مطالعاتی به روز با انگیزه توسعه کاربرد ابزارهای فناورانه در آموزش علوم پزشکی را ضرورت می بخشد. لذا این مطالعه با هدف بررسی ادراک دانشجویان علوم پزشکی از یادگیری سیار در آموزش علوم پزشکی وعوامل موثر بر آن را در مقایسه با مدل های پذیرش فناوری سیار FRAME و TAM، در قالب یک مطالعه کمی کیفی (ترکیبی) انجام گردید.
روش ها: مطالعه به صورت ترکیبی و در دو بخش کمی و کیفی انجام شده است. در بخش اول یا کمی ۱۲۰ پرسشنامه براساس مدل های TAM و FRAME که به صورت تصادفی طبقه ای بین دانشجویان علوم پزشکی جهرم از رشته های مختلف در اختیار داوطلبین شرکت کننده  قرار گرفت. در بخش دوم یا کیفی بر پایه مصاحبه با دانشجویان از مصاحبه های نیمه ساختار یافته به صورت مبتنی بر هدف در زمینه شاخص های پذیرش فناوری با ۳۰ نفر از دانشجویان علوم پزشکی جهرم از رشته های متفاوت که متمایل به شرکت در طرح بودند انجام شد و نتایج آن از طریق تحلیل محتوای کیفی گرانهایم و لاندمن ۲۰۰۴  با استخراج کدها، زیر تم ها و تم ها ادامه یافت و سپس با تطبیق شاخص های بخش کمی و کیفی با یکدیگر مدل جدید پذیرش فناوری از دانشجویان علوم پزشکی به دست آمد.
یافته ها: بر اساس روش کار انجام شده در بخش کمی در پرسشنامه TAM بیشترین میانگین مربوط به سودمندی درک شده از پذیرش فناوری (82/0±) ۶۱/۳ و در پرسشنامه FRAME بیشترین میانگین مربوط به بعد اجتماعی درک شده از پذیرش فناوری (76/0±) ۰۶/۴ بود. بر اساس دو مدل و بخش کیفی ، تعدادی از شاخص های به دست آمده در بخش کیفی با مدلهای مرسوم  پذیرش فناوری منطبق بود.
تم های جدید استخراج شده و موانع اشاره شده که با تطبیق دو مدل به دست آمد، مبین ضرورت تبیین مدل جدید مبتنی بر نیازهای احساس شده و ادراک شده بود که به لحاظ اجتماعی، روانی، بعد فرهنگی و محدودیت های دسترسی مدل پذیرش  فناوری را در حوزه آموزش علوم پزشکی پوشش دهد.
 
نتیجه گیری: مضامین جدید شناسایی شده در تلفیقی دو بخش کمی و کیفی و راهبردهای اتخاذ شده در این زمینه  میتواند مورد استفاده سیاستگذاران و طراحان و مدیران مراکز آموزشی علوم پزشکی و در امر یادگیری قرار بگیرد و میزان کارایی آنها را به حداکثر برسانند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Mobile learning in medical education and effective factors on the technology acceptance : hybrid study

نویسندگان [English]

  • leili mosalanejad 1
  • mansour tafvisi 2
  • ali kheymeh 1

1

2

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Considering the influence of technology in all fields of medical sciences and its emergence in the country in this study, we evaluate the experiences of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences students in mobile learning in medical science education and its effective factors in comparison with FRAME model and admission model. TAM technology is a quantitative-qualitative and hybrid study.
Methods: The study was conducted in two parts: qualitative and quantitative. In the first or quantitative part, 120 questionnaires based on TAM / FRAME models were distributed randomly among Jahrom medical students from different disciplines and each questionnaire examined the dimensions and factors affecting education and Mobile learning, including the learner and social dimensions, and the interactive dimension of factors that make mobile education useful and easy to use, and perceived barriers, were analyzed using conventional content analysis. In the second or qualitative part, semi-structured and face-to-face interviews were conducted with the viewpoints of Jahrom medical science students on technology acceptance indices with 30 Jahrom medical students from different disciplines who were willing to participate in the project and the results were analyzed by descriptive statistics on different themes and subthemes up to saturation of each theme. Then, by applying the qualitative and quantitative indicators, a new technology acceptance model was obtained from Jahrom medical students.
Results: According to the quantitative method, in TAM questionnaire the highest mean was related to perceived usefulness of technology acceptance with 3.61 and standard deviation ± 0.82 and in FRAME questionnaire the highest mean was related to perceived social dimension of technology acceptance with number. The standard deviation was 4.06 ± 0.76. In the qualitative section, the highest percentage of codecs extracted from student interviews was devoted to the 30% cost reduction theme of the benefits of using e-learning tools. According to the results obtained from both quantitative and qualitative parts, this study can be used as a new model of technology adoption.
Conclusion: The new model obtained from this study can be used by policy makers, designers, and managers of medical education centers to enhance their learning efficiency.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • mobile learning
  • Medical education
  • Strategies
  • Technology Acceptance Models  
1-Gholipour R. The impact of information technology on organizational structure and labor structure. Journal of Management Culture. 2004;2(7):127-52. 2. Barzegar R. From electronic learning to mobile learning: theoretical principles. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences (IJVLMS). 2012;3(2):35-41. 3. Horton W. Designing courseware for mobile devices, Mobile learning for expending educational opportunities. In Tokyo, Japan: Workshop Report .2005 : 16-20. 4. Park Y. A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. The international review of research in open and distributed learning. 2011;12(2):78-102. 5-Gillenson, M. L. and D.L. Sherrell, Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & management. 2002; 39(8): 705-719. 6-Moon, J.-W. and Y.-G. Kim, Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & management.2001; (4)38: 217-230. 7-Raats, M.M., R. Shepherd, and P. Sparks, Including Moral Dimensions of Choice Within the Structure of the Theory of Planned Behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1995;25(6): 484-494. 8-Pikkarainen, T., et al., Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet research, 2004;14(3): 224-235. 9-Gharibi, F. and A. Mohammadi. Learning through Mobile and education formal and informal. in International Conference on Teaching and Learning. 2009. 10- Koole ML. A model for framing mobile learning. Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training, 2009;1(2):25-47. 11. Khosravi N, Amir Teymori H. Investigating the effective factors on mobile learning in medical education based on FRAME Model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014;14(3):206-15. 12-Tung F-C, Chang S-C, Chou C-M. An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. International journal of medical informatics. 2008;77(5):324-35. 13-Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science. 1989;35(8):982-1003. 14-Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science. 1989;35(8):982-1003. 15. Khosravi N, Amir Teymori H. Investigating the effective factors on mobile learning in medical education based on FRAME Model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014;14(3):206-15. 16-Ashrafzadeh A, Sayadian S. University instructors’ concerns and perceptions of technology integration. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;49:62-73. 17-Hosseini S N, Mirzaei Alavijeh M, Ataee M, Jalilian F, Karami Matin B, Rastegar L. E-learning Adoption by Faculty Members of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: Faculties’ Viewpoints. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014; 14 (5) :437-447. 18-Teymori H. Investigating the Effective Factors on Mobile Learning in Medical Education Based on FRAME Model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014; 14 (3) :206-215. 19- Kumar S, Vigil K. The net generation as preservice teachers: Transferring familiarity with new technologies to educational environments. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 2011;27(4):144-53. 20-Al-Emran, M., V. Mezhuyev, and A. Kamaludin, Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 2018, 125: 389-412. 21-Cakir, R. and E. Solak, Exploring the Factors Influencing E-Learning of Turkish EFL Learners through TAM. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 2014. 13(3): 79-87. 22-Hartman, H. and P. Johnson, The effectiveness of multimedia for teaching drug mechanisms of action to undergraduate health students. Computers & Education, 2018. 125: 202-211. 23- Kumar S, Vigil K. The net generation as preservice teachers: Transferring familiarity with new technologies to educational environments. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 2011 ; 1;27(4):144-53. 24-- Davis D, Chen G, Hauff C, Houben GJ. Activating learning at scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies. Computers & Education. 2018;125:327-44. 25- Obonyo C, Davis NH, Fickel L. Mobile learning practices in initial teacher education. 26-Wang, L., Effectiveness of text-based mobile learning applications: case studies in tertiary education: a thesis presented to the academic faculty, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Information Sciences in Information Technology, Massey University. 2009, Massey University. 27-Nikou, S.A. and A.A. Economides, Mobile-based assessment: A literature review of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 2018. 125: 101-119. 28- Ghorbanizadeh V, Nangeer H, Taha S, Roodsaz SH. Meta-analysis of effecting factors on the information technology acceptance in Iran. Management Research in Iran. 2013 May 10;17(2):177-96. 29- Abdekhoda M, Ahmadi M, Hossini AF, Prikhani E, Farhadi A. Factors affecting information technology acceptance by health information management (HIM) staff of Tehran university of medical sciences’ hospitals based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) in 2011. Journal of Payavard Salamat. 2013 Nov 15;7(4):287-98. 30- Esmaeili M, Eshlaghi AT, Ebrahimi AP, Esmaieli R. Study on feasibility and acceptance of implementation of Technology Acceptance Model of Davis in staff of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Pajoohandeh Journal. 2013 Apr 15;18(1):40-5. 31-Redmond P, Abawi LA, Brown A, Henderson R, Heffernan A. An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning. 2018;22(1):183-204. 32-Kukulska-Hulme A, Traxler J. Mobile learning. Mobile Learning: A Handbook for Educators and Trainers. Oxon: Routledge. 2005:1-6. 33-Criollo-C S, Luján-Mora S, Jaramillo-Alcázar A. Advantages and disadvantages of M-learning in current education. In2018 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE) 2018 Mar 11 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
آموزش و اخلاق در پرستاری
دوره 9، 1-2
فروردین 1399
صفحه 102-111