1-Gholipour R. The impact of information technology on organizational structure and labor structure. Journal of Management Culture. 2004;2(7):127-52. 2. Barzegar R. From electronic learning to mobile learning: theoretical principles. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences (IJVLMS). 2012;3(2):35-41. 3. Horton W. Designing courseware for mobile devices, Mobile learning for expending educational opportunities. In Tokyo, Japan: Workshop Report .2005 : 16-20. 4. Park Y. A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. The international review of research in open and distributed learning. 2011;12(2):78-102. 5-Gillenson, M. L. and D.L. Sherrell, Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & management. 2002; 39(8): 705-719. 6-Moon, J.-W. and Y.-G. Kim, Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & management.2001; (4)38: 217-230. 7-Raats, M.M., R. Shepherd, and P. Sparks, Including Moral Dimensions of Choice Within the Structure of the Theory of Planned Behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1995;25(6): 484-494. 8-Pikkarainen, T., et al., Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet research, 2004;14(3): 224-235. 9-Gharibi, F. and A. Mohammadi. Learning through Mobile and education formal and informal. in International Conference on Teaching and Learning. 2009. 10- Koole ML. A model for framing mobile learning. Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training, 2009;1(2):25-47. 11. Khosravi N, Amir Teymori H. Investigating the effective factors on mobile learning in medical education based on FRAME Model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014;14(3):206-15. 12-Tung F-C, Chang S-C, Chou C-M. An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. International journal of medical informatics. 2008;77(5):324-35. 13-Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science. 1989;35(8):982-1003. 14-Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science. 1989;35(8):982-1003. 15. Khosravi N, Amir Teymori H. Investigating the effective factors on mobile learning in medical education based on FRAME Model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014;14(3):206-15. 16-Ashrafzadeh A, Sayadian S. University instructors’ concerns and perceptions of technology integration. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;49:62-73. 17-Hosseini S N, Mirzaei Alavijeh M, Ataee M, Jalilian F, Karami Matin B, Rastegar L. E-learning Adoption by Faculty Members of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and Health Services: Faculties’ Viewpoints. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014; 14 (5) :437-447. 18-Teymori H. Investigating the Effective Factors on Mobile Learning in Medical Education Based on FRAME Model. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014; 14 (3) :206-215. 19- Kumar S, Vigil K. The net generation as preservice teachers: Transferring familiarity with new technologies to educational environments. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 2011;27(4):144-53. 20-Al-Emran, M., V. Mezhuyev, and A. Kamaludin, Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 2018, 125: 389-412. 21-Cakir, R. and E. Solak, Exploring the Factors Influencing E-Learning of Turkish EFL Learners through TAM. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 2014. 13(3): 79-87. 22-Hartman, H. and P. Johnson, The effectiveness of multimedia for teaching drug mechanisms of action to undergraduate health students. Computers & Education, 2018. 125: 202-211. 23- Kumar S, Vigil K. The net generation as preservice teachers: Transferring familiarity with new technologies to educational environments. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 2011 ; 1;27(4):144-53. 24-- Davis D, Chen G, Hauff C, Houben GJ. Activating learning at scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies. Computers & Education. 2018;125:327-44. 25- Obonyo C, Davis NH, Fickel L. Mobile learning practices in initial teacher education. 26-Wang, L., Effectiveness of text-based mobile learning applications: case studies in tertiary education: a thesis presented to the academic faculty, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Information Sciences in Information Technology, Massey University. 2009, Massey University. 27-Nikou, S.A. and A.A. Economides, Mobile-based assessment: A literature review of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 2018. 125: 101-119. 28- Ghorbanizadeh V, Nangeer H, Taha S, Roodsaz SH. Meta-analysis of effecting factors on the information technology acceptance in Iran. Management Research in Iran. 2013 May 10;17(2):177-96. 29- Abdekhoda M, Ahmadi M, Hossini AF, Prikhani E, Farhadi A. Factors affecting information technology acceptance by health information management (HIM) staff of Tehran university of medical sciences’ hospitals based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) in 2011. Journal of Payavard Salamat. 2013 Nov 15;7(4):287-98. 30- Esmaeili M, Eshlaghi AT, Ebrahimi AP, Esmaieli R. Study on feasibility and acceptance of implementation of Technology Acceptance Model of Davis in staff of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Pajoohandeh Journal. 2013 Apr 15;18(1):40-5. 31-Redmond P, Abawi LA, Brown A, Henderson R, Heffernan A. An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning. 2018;22(1):183-204. 32-Kukulska-Hulme A, Traxler J. Mobile learning. Mobile Learning: A Handbook for Educators and Trainers. Oxon: Routledge. 2005:1-6. 33-Criollo-C S, Luján-Mora S, Jaramillo-Alcázar A. Advantages and disadvantages of M-learning in current education. In2018 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE) 2018 Mar 11 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.