آموزش و اخلاق در پرستاری
Education and Ethics In Nursing ISSN: 2322-5300

مقایسۀ دانش کارورزان طب اورژانس در مدیریت تندتپشی‌های شایع قبل و بعد از آموزش به روش مدل محور و سخنرانی: یک مطالعۀ نیمه تجربی قبل و بعد از مداخله

https://doi.org/10.22034/ethic.2023.703085
دوره 11، شماره 2
مهر 1401
صفحه 42-49
آموزش و اخلاق در پرستاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

سید رضا حبیب زاده 1
حسین کریمی مونقی 2
الناز وفادار مرادی 1
احسان بلوردی 3
فاطمه ملکی 4
امیر تیموری 5
مهدی فروغیان 3

1 استادیار گروه طب اورژانس، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

2 استادآموزش پرستاری، مرکزتحقیقات مراقبت های پرستاری و مامائی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد،ایران

3 دانشیار گروه طب اورژانس، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

4 استادیار گروه طب اورژانس، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران.

5 کمیته تحقیقات دانشجویی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

چکیده
مقدمه: امروزه، بیماری ­های قلب و عروق، شایع­ترین علل مرگ و میر است. تاکی­ کاردی، معمولاً یک اورژانس طبی است که نشان دهندۀ دیس ­ریتمی قلب، می­ باشد. هدف از انجام این مطالعه، مقایسۀ دانش کارورزان طب اورژانس در مدیریت تند تپشی­ های شایع قبل و بعد از آموزش، به روش مدل محور و سخنرانی می ­باشد.
روش کار: ‏در این پژوهش نیمه تجربی، قبل و بعد از مداخله، تعداد 122 کارورز طب اورژانس (1399)، وارد مطالعه شدند. دانشجویان، به صورت تصادفی در دو گروه، کارگاه آموزشی مدل محور (60 نفر) و سخنرانی(62 نفر)، تقسیم شدند. ابزار جمع آوری اطلاعات در این تحقیق، بر اساس پرسشنامۀ محقق ساخته بود، که روایی و پایایی آن (آلفای کرونباخ=85%) مورد تأیید واقع شده بود. پرسشنامه، توسط هر دو گروه از دانشجویان، به صورت قبل از شروع و بعد از اتمام مداخله، تکمیل گشت. تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات، با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS نسخۀ 20، آمارهای توصیفی (درصد، میانگین و انحراف معیار) و آزمون ­های استنباطی ( من ویتنی و ویلکاکسون)، صورت گرفته است؛ آن­ گونه­ که در تمامی محاسبات، مقدار 0.05 ، به ­عنوان سطح معنادار، در نظر گرفته شد.
یافته‌ها: میانگین نمرۀ آزمون مدیریت تندتپشی ­ها، پس از آموزش در گروه سخنرانی، برابر با 1.9±6.8 (از 13 نمره) و میانگین نمرۀ آزمون مدیریت تندتپشی­ ها، پس از آموزش در گروه کارگاه آموزشی مدل محور، برابر 1.5±6.9 (از 13 نمره)، بود. طبق آزمون ناپارامتریک من ویتنی، تفاوت آماری معناداری، از نظر میانگین نمرۀ آزمون مدیریت تندتپشی­ ها، پس از آموزش میان دو گروه کارگاه آموزشی مدل محور و گروه سخنرانی، وجود داشت(p=0.001)؛ همچنین حد وسط  نمرۀ آزمون مدیریت تندتپشی ­ها، پس از آموزش در گروه کارگاه آموزشی مدل محور، بالاتر بود.
نتیجه ­گیری: به­ نظر می ­رسد که استفاده از روش مدل محور (کارگاه عملی با مولاژ، و استفاده از سناریوی بالینی)، می ­تواند بر دانش کارورزان طب اورژانس، در مدیریت تندتپشی­ های شایع، قبل و بعد از آموزش، نسبت به روش سخنرانی، اثربخشی بیشتری داشته باشد؛ بنابراین استفاده از روش مدل محور، می ­تواند سبب افزایش دانش کارورزان طب اورژانس گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

سخنرانی
مدل محور
آموزش
کارورزان
طب اورژانس
تندتپشی

عنوان مقاله English

The Comparison of the Knowledge of Emergency Medicine Interns in Management of common tachycardia before and after Model-Based training and Lecture: a semi-experimental study before and after the intervention

نویسندگان English

Seyed Reza Habibzadeh 1
Hossein Karimi Moonaghi 2
Elnaz Vafadar Moradi 1
Ehsan Bolvardi 3
Fatemeh Maleki 4
Amir Teimouri 5
Mahdi Foroughian 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 Professor of Nursing Education, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3 Associated Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4 Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
5 Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death, today. Tachycardia is usually a medical
emergency that indicates cardiac dysrhythmia. The aim of this study was to compare the knowledge of emergency medicine interns in the management of common rapid heartbeats before and after training by model-based and lecture methods.
Materials and Methods: In this semi-experimental study, before and after the intervention, 122 emergency medicine interns were included in the study (2019). Students were randomly divided into two groups: model-based workshop (60 people) and lecture (62 people). The data collection tool in this study was a researcher-made questionnaire whose validity and reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 85%) were confirmed. The questionnaire was completed by both groups of students before the intervention and after the intervention. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 20 software and descriptive statistics (percentage, mean and standard deviation) and inferential tests (Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon). In all calculations, the value of 0.05 was considered as a significant level.
Results: The mean score of the tachycardia management test after training in the lecture group was 8.6± 9.1 points (out of 13 points). And the mean score of the management test of tachycardia, after training in the model-based workshop group, is equal to 5. It was 6.9±1.00 points (out of 13 marks).
According to Mann-Whitney non-parametric test, there was a statistically significant difference in terms of the mean score of the pulse management test after training between the two groups of model-based workshop and lecture group (P = 0.001). Also, the mean score of the rapid-fire management test after training was higher in the model-oriented workshop group.
Conclusion: It seems that the use of model-based method (practical workshop with modeling and clinical scenario) can be more effective on the knowledge of emergency medicine practitioners in the management of common tachycardia before and after training than the lecture method. Therefore, using the model-based method can increase the knowledge of emergency medicine students.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Lecture
  • Model Oriented Education
  • Training
  • Students
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Tachycardia
  1. Lopez AD, Matheres CD, Ezzati M. Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors. Washington (DC): Oxford University Press 2006.
  2. Myerburg RJ. Sudden cardiac death: exploring the limits of our knowledge. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2001; 12(3): 369-81.
  3. Vreede Swagemakers JJ, Gorgels AP, Dubois Arbouw WI, van Ree JW, Daemen MJ, Houben LG, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the 1990s: a population-based study in the Maastricht area on incidence, characteristics and sur-vival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30(6): 1500-5.
  4. Ghazanfari Z, Forouzi M, Khosravi F. The opinions of  graduated  students  of  medicine  on  the  amount  of compatibility existing between the programs of clinical education and their occupation needs in Kerman. J Babol Univ Med Sci Summer 2010; 12(1): 52-9.
  5. Malekan rad A, Eynollahi B, Hosseini J, Momtaz manesh N. Clinical teaching and assessment. Tehran: Tohfe; 2006.
  6. Shams B, Jamshidian S, Changiz T. Educational Challenges in Ambulatory Pediatrics Teaching Programs Based on the Experiences of Interns and Attends: a Qualitative Study. Strides Dev Med Educ 2010; 7(2): 81-91.
  7. Sandilands EA, Reld K, Shaw L, Bateman DN, Webb DJ, Dhaun N, et al. Impact of a focussed teaching programme on practical prescribing skills among final year medical students. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011 Jan; 71(1): 29-33.
  8. Tobaiqy M, Mclay J, Ross S. Foundation year  1  doctor  and  clinical  pharmacology  and  therapeutic  A retrospective view in light of experience. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 64(3): 363-72.
  9. Khorasani Gh A, Shahbaznezhad L, Selk Ghafari L, Vahidshahi K, Mahmoudi M. Evaluation of faculty members’ and students’  attitude  towards  ambulatory  teaching    J  Mazandaran  Univ  Med  Sci 2007;  17(58):  87-100
    1. Golafrooz Shahri H, Khaghanizade M. Introduction to oral presentation teaching method. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2010; 2(4): 161-6.
    2. Sadeghi Z, Mohtashami R. Comparison of Effect of Two Education Management and Traditional Education Methods on Academic Motivation of Medical Students. Journal of Medicla Education Development. 2018; 11(31): 63-74.
    3. Gerdprasert S, Pruksacheva T, Panijpan B, Ruenwongsa P. Development of a web-based learning medium on mechanism of labour for nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 2010 Jul;30(5):464-9.
    4. Gabr H, Mohamed N ,Effect of Problem- Based Learning on Undergraduate Nursing Students Enrolled in Nursing Administration Course, International Journal of Academic Research,2011;3(1):154-162.
    5. Slavin RE, Cheung A, Groff C, Lake C. Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Read Res Quart 2008; 43(3): 290-322.
    6. Manzari Z, Masoumian Hoseini S T, Karimi Moonaghi H, Behnam Vashani H, Khaleghi I. Comparing the effect of two educational methods (context based learning and lecture) on nurse’s knowledge, attitude and practice about nurse’s role in organ donation process. Nurs Midwifery J. 2015; 13 (9) :758-771.
    7. Bafghi A, Karimi H, Anvari MH, Barzegar K. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Teaching Methods of Group Discussion and Lecturing in Learning Rate of Laboratory Medicine Students. Strides in Development of Medical Education Journal of Medical Education Development Center 2007; 4(1): 51-56.
    8. Azizi A, Alaee A, Valaii N, Amjadzadeh M, Fardinnasr A. Knowledge and satisfaction of dental students with the instruction of oral and maxillofacial medicine: Web-based instruction versus the traditional instruction . J Res Dent Sci. 2017; 14 (1) :57-62
    9. Kazemi T, Zare Bidaki M, Gholami manzari A H, Amirabadizadeh N, Mohammadi Y. Comparison of the effectiveness of lecture and mixed training methods for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia topic on the academic motivation of medical clerks and interns. JMED. 2021; 15 (4) :260-270
    10. Mollazadeh H, Kameli A, Jafari chogan M, Mirhosseini F, Shoja M. Comparing the effect of education by lecture and multimedia software on learning of fundamental of nursing in nursing students. JNKUMS. 2014; 6 (1) :151-159.
    11. Lakdashti A, Yousefi R, Khatiri K. The effect of educational simulator software’s on learning and remembering in university Students and comparing it with traditional methods] [Article in Persian]. Inform Commun Technol Educ Sci 2011;1(3):5-21.
    12. Nikravan-Mofrad M, Zohari Anboohi S. The effect of simulation training method on
      enabling student nurses in advanced pre-hospital operation. ICNS. 2013; 4 (1): 32-38.
    13. Wright A, Moss P, M. Dennis D, Harrold M, Levy S, Anne L. Furness and Alan Reubenson. The influence of a full-time, immersive simulation-based clinical placement on physiotherapy student confidence during the transition to clinical practice. Adv Simul. 2018; 3(3), 24-30.
    14. Norozi H, Mohsenizadeh S, Jafary Suny H, Ebrahimzadeh S. [The Effect of Teaching Uning a Blend of Collaborative and Mastery of Learning Models, on Learning of Vital Signs: An Experiment on Nursing and Operation Room Students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011; 11(5): 544-53.
    15. Mitchell EA, Ryan A, Carson O, McCann S, An exploratory study of web-enhanced learning in undergraduate nurse education, JCclin Nurs. 2007; 16:2287-2296.
    16. Shahsavari Esfahani S, Beigi P, Behin Aien N, Ayatollahi AR, Teaching Nursing Students about the Basic Principles of Infection Control: Programmed Instruction or Lecture Method ,Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2004;5(1): 23- 30.
    17. Qzelbash A, Atashzadeh F, Alavi Majd H,Yaghmaei F, Comparison of ECG correctreading learning method of problem solving and learning in lecture and tutorial method with computerized nursing students, Journal of- Nursing Research 2008; 3(11):7-15.
    18. Jafari M. Comparison of Lecture and Blended Teaching Methods on Learning and Satisfaction of Medical Students in Biochemistry Course . Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2012; 12 (7) :488-497.
    19. Kardan Barzoki E, Bakhshandeh H, nikpajouh A, Elahi E, Haghjoo M. Comparison of the effect of education through lecture and multimedia methods on knowledge, attitude, and performance of cardiac care. Irainian journal of cardiovascular nursing. 2016;4(4): 6-13.
    20. Yadollah Siavash Vahabi MSc, Seyyed Davood Tadrisi, Shahnaz Ghayem, Abbass Ebadi, Mohammad Daneshmandi, Masoud Saghafi Nia. Iranian Journal of Critical Care Nursing,. 2011; 4(1): 7-12.
    21. Ebadi A, Yousefi Goshtasb Sh, Khaghanizadeh M, Hosseini SMJ, Raeisifar A, Masoumi M, et al . Comparison the effect of conventional and distance training on nurses' clinical skills. J Mil Med. 2010; 12 (2) :71-74.
    22. Zolfaghari M, Mehrdad N, Parsa Yekta Z, Salmani Barugh N, Bahrani N, The Effect of Lecture and E-learning Methods on Learning Mother and Child Health Course in Nursing Students , IJME, 2007; 7(1):31-39.

صفحه اصلی

راهنمای نویسندگان

ارسال مقاله

تماس با ما