Education and Ethics In Nursing ISSN: 2322-5300

دیدگاه بیماران در زمینۀ رعایت رفتار حرفه ای توسط پزشکان متخصص: یک مطالعۀ توصیفی - مقطعی در جنوب ایران

دوره 12، شماره 1
فروردین 1402
صفحه 12-21

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان

1 گروه زنان و نازایی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جهرم، جهرم، ایران.

2 کمیته تحقیقات دانشجویی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جهرم، جهرم، ایران.

3 استادیار، مرکز تحقیقات اخلاق پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جهرم، جهرم، ایران.

چکیده
مقدمه: حرفه­ گرایی پزشکی، یک سیستم هنجاری است که مراقبت­ های بهداشتی را سازماندهی و ارائه می ­دهد. استانداردها و ارزش­ هایی که پزشکان خود را نسبت به آن متعهد می­ سازند، تضمین کنندۀ آن است که تمام متخصصان پزشکی، مراقبت ­های با کیفیت را به بیماران خود ارائه می ­دهند؛ بنابراین پژوهش حاضر، با هدف بررسی دیدگاه بیماران مراجعه کننده به کلینیک ­های درمانی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جهرم، در زمینۀ رعایت رفتار حرفه ­ای توسط پزشکان متخصص، انجام شد.
روش کار: این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی - مقطعی می­ باشد، که نمونه گیری در این مطالعه به صورت تصادفی انجام شد. ابزار جمع آوری اطلاعات در این تحقیق، شامل دو پرسشنامۀ اطلاعات دموگرافیک و رعایت رفتار حرفه ­ای توسط پزشکان متخصص می ­باشد. تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات در این بررسی، با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS نسخۀ 21، آزمون­های آماری توصیفی (میانگین، درصد و انحراف معیار) و استنباطی (کای دو و تی تست) در سطح معناداری (p<0.05) انجام شده است.
یافته‌ها: از 295 نفر از بیماران مراجعه‌کننده، 52.5 % مرد و بقیۀ آن­ها زن بودند. در میان گویه­ های پرسشنامه، رعایت رفتار حرفه‌ای توسط پزشکان متخصص، بالاترین رضایت از گویه مربوط به «پزشکان معالج با بیمار و خانواده‌ام با احترام رفتار می‌نمایند» و کم­ترین رضایت از گویه متعلق به «پزشکان معالج من در صورت نارضایتی من از عملکرد سایر پزشکان و درخواست من از جهت پیگیری قانونی، من را راهنمایی می‌نمایند»، بوده است. آزمون تی تست مستقل نشان داد که میان جنسیت و رعایت رفتار حرفه‌ای توسط پزشکان متخصص ارتباط وجود دارد (0.023=p). میزان رضایت از رفتار حرفه‌ای پزشکان متخصص در زنان، بالاتر از مردان بوده است. نتایج آزمون آنوا نشان داد که میان سن، تحصیلات، تأهل و رعایت رفتار حرفه‌ای توسط پزشکان متخصص، ارتباط وجود ندارد (0.05<p).
نتیجه‌گیری: یافته ­های این پژوهش بر رعایت آموزش و توانمندسازی متخصصان بالینی بر رفتار حرفه ­ای، در زمینه هایی که نیازمند ارائه بازخوردهای تخصصی است، تأکید دارد؛ چنان که می ­توان آن را در برنامه ­های آموزش متوالی مورد توجه قرار داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Examining the patients' views on professional behavior by specialist Physicians: a cross-sectional descriptive study in southern Iran

نویسندگان English

Hajar Taghizadeh 1
Athar Rasekh Jahromi 1
Nilofar Derakhshan 2
Majid Tavakol 3
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
2 Student Research Committee, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Medical Ethic Research Center, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Medical professionalism is a normative system that organizes and provides health care. The standards
and values that doctors commit themselves to; it ensures that all medical professionals provide quality care to their patients. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of investigating the views of patients referring to the treatment clinics of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences regarding the observance of professional behavior by specialist Physicians.
 Materials & Methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. Sampling in this study was done randomly from all patients referred to Imam Reza Clinic of Peymaniyeh Hospital and Honari Clinic of Motahari Hospital of Jahrom city in 2023. The data collection tool in this study includes two demographic information questionnaires and a professional behavior questionnaire by specialist physisians. Demographic information questionnaire which includes information such as: age of patients, gender of patients, level of education and marital status). Data analysis in this study using SPSS software version 21 and using descriptive statistical tests (mean, percentage and standard deviation) and inferential statistical tests (chi-square and t-test) at a significance level of P<0.05.
Results: Out of 295 patients, 52.5% were male and the rest were female. Among the items in the questionnaire
regarding professional behavior by specialist physisians, the highest satisfaction is from the item "The treating doctors treat my patient and family with respect." Also, the least have been satisfied with the item "My treating doctors guide me legally in case of my dissatisfaction with the performance of other doctors and my request for follow-up." The independent t-test showed that there is a relationship between gender and compliance with professional behavior by specialist physisians (P=0.023). The
level of satisfaction with the professional behavior of specialist physisians is higher in women than in men. But the results of ANOVA test showed that there is no relationship between age, education, marriage and compliance with professional behavior by specialist physisians (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The findings of this research point to the necessity of training and empowering clinical experts on professional behavior in fields that require providing expert feedback; which can be considered in continuous education programs.

1.Dehghani A, Dastpak M, Gharib A. Barriers to
Respect Professional Ethics Standards in Clinical Care
Viewpoints of Nurses. IJME 2013; 13 (5):421-430. .
2.Arnold L. Assessing professional behavior: yesterday,
today, and tomorrow. Acad Med 2002; 77(6):502–
515.
3.Hodges BD, Ginsburg S, Cruess R, Cruess S, Delport
R, Hafferty F, et al. Assessment of professionalism:
recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference.
Med Teach 2011; 33(5):354-63.
4.Papadakis MA, Paauw DS, Hafferty FW, Shapiro J,
Byyny RL. Perspective: the education community
must develop best practices informed by evidencebased research to remediate lapses of professionalism.
Acad Med 2012; 87(12):1694–1698.
5.Adam J, Bore M, McKendree J, Munro D, Powis D.
Can personal qualities of medical students predict incourse examination success and professional
behavior? an exploratory prospective cohort study.
BMC Med Educ 2012; 12:69.
6.Cruess R, McIlroy JH, Cruess S, Ginsburg S, Steinert
Y. The professionalism mini-evaluation exercise: a
preliminary investigation. Acad Med 2006; 81(10
Suppl):74–78.
7.Fazeli Z, Fazeli Bavandpour F, Rezaee Tavirani M,
Mozafari M, Haidari Moghadam R. Professional
ethics and its role in the medicine. JIUMS 2013
winter; 20(5):10-7.
8.Martinez SA. Reforming medical ethics education. J
Law Med Ethics 2002 Fall; 30(3):452-6.
9.Abim Foundation; ACP-ASIM Foundation; European
Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical
professionalism in the new millennium: a physician
charter. Ann Intern Med 2002 Feb 5; 136(3):243-6.
10. Morris KA. The doctor patient relationship chapter
1. Cole’s medical practice in New Zealand: Medical
council of New Zealand. 14nd ed 2021:7-22.
11. Stewart EA, Marzio DH, Guggenheim DE, Gotto J,
Veloski JJ, Kane GC. Resident scores on a patient
satisfaction survey: evidence for maintenance of
communication skills throughout residency. J Grad
Med Educ 2011 Dec; 3(4):487–89.
12. Woodruff JN, Angelos P, Valaitis S. Medical
professionalism: one size fits all? Perspect Biol Med
2008; 51(4):525–534.
13. Young CE. Medical professionalism in the 21st
century. Tenn Med 2013; 106(8):5, 40.
14. Knights JA, Kennedy BJ. Medical school selection:
screening for dysfunctional tendencies. Med Edu 2006
Nov; 40(11):1058-64.
15. Coulehan J, Williams PC. Vanquishing virtue: the
impact of medical education. Acad Med 2001 Jun;
76(6):598-605.
16. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, Knettler
TR, Rattner SL, Stern DT, et al. Disciplinary action by
medical boards and prior behavior in medical school.
N Engl J Med 2005 Dec; 353(25):2673-82.
17. Lee AG, Beaver HA, Boldt HC, Olson R, Oetting
TA, Abramoff M, et al. Teaching and assessing
professionalism in ophthalmology residency training
آموزش دانشجویان یکی از مصادیق باقیّات الصّالحات فرشته عراقیان مجرد و همکاران
دو فصلنامه آموزش و اخالق در پرستاری، دوره دوازدهم، شماره یک و دو، بهار و تابستان1091
12
programs. Surv Ophthalmol 2007 May- Jun;
52(3):300-14.
18. Swick HM. Toward a normative definition of
medical professionalism. Acad Med 2000; 75(6):612–
6.
19. Khoshamooz H, Godarzvand M, Rezaeai H.
Relationship between Professional Ethics and Staff
Knowledge to Hospital Accreditation. Ethic Sci
Techno 2020; 14 :195-198
20. Tromp F, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Kramer A, Grol R,
Bottema B. Behavioural elements of professionalism:
assessment of a fundamental concept in medical care.
Med Teach 2010 Jan; 32(4):e161-9.
21. Hajibabaee F, Moghimi Darzi S K, Khatami F,
Ashrafizadeh H, Shojaei A. Evaluation of
Psychometric Properties of the tool for identifying
"Patients' Views on the Observance of Professional
Behavior by Specialized Physicians". JAUMS 2021;
21(3):329-339
22. Sattarzadeh Badkoubeh, R, Asghari F, Shahvari Z.
Designing and Validating the Tool for Assessing the
Professional Behavior of Clinical Faculty Members; A
Tool in Stakeholder’s View. IJME 2019; 19 :199-212
23. Statistical Yearbook 2017 of Jahrom University of
Medical Sciences, which can be viewed on the
university's website at the address.
https://jums.ac.ir/Index.aspx?tempname=Amar&lang
=1&sub=26
24. Parsons MB, Reid DH. Reading groups: A practical
means of enhancing professional knowledge among
human service practitioners. Behav Anal Pract 2011;
4(2):53–60.
25. Arnold L. Assessing professional behavior:
yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acad Med 2002 Jun;
77(6):502-15.
26. Yavari N, Asghari F, Shahvari Z, Nedjat S, Larijani
B. Obstacles of professional behavior among medical
trainees: A qualitative study from Iran (2018). J Educ
Health Promot 2019 Oct 24; 8:193.
27. Jha V, Bekker HL, Duffy SR, Roberts TE. A
systematic review of studies assessing and facilitating
attitudes towards professionalism in medicine. Med
Educ 2007; 41(8):822–829.
28. Hafler JP, Ownby AR, Thompson BM, Fasser CE,
Grigsby K, Haidet P, et al. Decoding the learning
environment of medical education: A hidden
curriculum perspective for faculty development. Acad
Med 2011; 86:440–4.
29. Blackall GF, Melnick SA, Shoop GH, George J,
Lerner SM, Wilson PK, Pees RC, Kreher M.
Professionalism in medical education: the
development and validation of a survey instrument to
assess attitudes toward professionalism. Med Teach
2007; 29(2–3):58–62.
30. Isfahani P, Nezamdust F. Patients' Satisfaction in
hospitals of Iran: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2019; 13(4):58-72.
31. Lewis JR. Patient views on quality care in general
practice: literature review. Soci Sci Med 1994;
39:655–70.
32. Chue P. The relationship between patient
satisfaction and treatment outcomes in schizophrenia.
J Psychopharmacol 2006; 20(Suppl 6):38–56.
33. Glickman SW, Boulding W, Manary M, et al.
Patient satisfaction and its relationship with clinical
quality and inpatient mortality in acute myocardial
infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010;
3(2):188–195.
34. Okonta KE, Ogaji DS. Relationship Between Patient
Satisfaction and Willingness to Comply With
Physicians' Recommendation in Referral Surgical
Outpatient Clinic in Nigeria. J Patient Exp 2020 Dec;
7(6):1556-1562.
35. Boissy A, Windover AK, Bokar D, Karafa M,
Neuendorf K, Frankel RM, Merlino J, Rothberg MB.
Communication Skills Training for Physicians
Improves Patient Satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med 2016
Jul; 31(7):755-61.
36. Shamsi-Gooshki E, Parsapoor A, Asghari F, Parsa
M, Saeedinejad Y, Biroudian S, et al. Developing
"Code of Ethics for Medical Professionals, Medical
Council of Islamic Republic of Iran". Arch Iran Med
2020 Oct 1; 23(10):658-664.
37. NoroSana R, Rezaiyan S, Moradi S, Rezaian Z.
Investigating the level of patients' satisfaction with the
services of general practitioners: a cross-sectional
study. JME 2012; 22(6):161-184.