Education and Ethics In Nursing ISSN: 2322-5300

Euthanasia on the Scales: A Logical-Philosophical Analysis of the Relationship Between Euthanasia and the Mission of Health Sciences

10.22034/ethic.2026.2094142.1243
Volume 15, Issue 1
June 2026
Pages 119-126
Education and Ethics In Nursing ISSN: 2322-5300

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

Arezoo Behzadi 1
Aliakbar Shakeri 2

1 Research Center for Nursing and Midwifery Care, Comprehensive Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

2 Medical Ethics Research Center, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom , Iran

Abstract
Background: Euthanasia is one of the most challenging issues in end-of-life care and has predominantly been examined from ethical, legal, and religious perspectives. However, its relationship with the conceptual foundations and fundamental goals of the philosophy of health sciences has received comparatively little attention. The present study aimed to analyze this relationship and provide a philosophical interpretation of euthanasia within the framework of the philosophy of health sciences.
Methods: This documentary-analytical study was conducted through a purposive review of relevant scientific and philosophical literature. Data were analyzed using conceptual analysis, logical reasoning, reductio ad absurdum, and thought experiments. The concept and essential components of euthanasia were first clarified, followed by an examination of its relationship with the foundational principles and goals of the philosophy of health sciences.
Results: The findings indicated that the defining feature of euthanasia is the deliberate termination of human life with the intention of relieving suffering. Philosophical analysis further demonstrated that the preservation of life, the promotion of health, and the alleviation of suffering constitute interconnected goals of the health sciences. Nevertheless, when relief of suffering is achieved through the intentional termination of life, its compatibility with the fundamental mission of the health sciences becomes philosophically problematic. Within this framework, euthanasia was found to be inconsistent with the core goals of the philosophy of health sciences.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that, independent of ethical, legal, and religious evaluations, euthanasia requires philosophical reconsideration regarding its relationship with the fundamental mission of the health sciences. By focusing on the conceptual foundations and goals of the health sciences, this study offers a distinct philosophical perspective that may contribute to the theoretical literature and promote further research in the philosophy of health sciences and end-of-life care.

Keywords

Euthanasia
Philosophy of Medicine
End-of-Life Care

Furlan TJ. James Rachels and the Morality of Euthanasia. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 2024;45(2):69–97. doi:10.1007/s11017-024-09658-2.

2.            Materstvedt LJ, Clark D, Ellershaw J, Førde R, Gravgaard AM, Müller-Busch HC, Porta i Sales J, Rapin CH; EAPC Ethics Task Force. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a view from an EAPC Ethics Task Force. Palliat Med. 2003 Mar;17(2):97-101; discussion 102-79. doi: 10.1191/0269216303pm673oa.

3.            Aghakhani N, Ewalds-Kvist BM, Naseri S. Euthanasia in End-of-Life Care: Ethical Compassion or Dilemma? J Caring Sci. 2025 Aug 30;14(3):214-216. doi: 10.34172/jcs.025.35289.

4.            Rahmani M, Zarvandi N, Abdoljabari M. The Jurisprudence Sentence for Euthanasia. Journal of Pizhuhish dar din va salamat. 2018;4(4):104-17.

5.            Jafari Harandi M, Jabbarzadeh F. A Jurisprudential and Legal Study of Euthanasia (Mercy Killing). 2012. (In Persian).

6.            Harandi DM. A Jurisprudential and Legal Study of Euthanasia. 2012. (In Persian).

7.            Sadeghi M. A Jurisprudential and Legal Study of Euthanasia. Legal Studies. 2015;7(2):99–122. (In Persian).

8.            Mohammadi R, Z N, A M. Jurisprudential Ruling on Euthanasia. Research on Religion and Health [Internet]. 2018;4(4):104–117. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/407957/fa. (In Persian).

9.            Yadollahpour B. The Theory of Euthanasia (Autonomous and Active Euthanasia) In Quranic Perspective. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2013; 15 (1) :56-65. URL: http://jbums.org/article-1-4325-fa.html

10.          Parsapour A, Hemmati Moghaddam A, Parsapour M, Larijani B. Euthanasia: ethical explanation and analysis . Iran J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2008; 1 (4) :1-12. URL: http://ijme.tums.ac.ir/article-1-294-en.html

11.          Hashemi Z, Mortazavi M. Euthanasia from Islam and modern medical ethics perspectives. Iran J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2008; 1 (3) :35-44. URL: http://ijme.tums.ac.ir/article-1-307-en.html

 

12.          Sarikhani A, Khanghani Isfahani M. The right to die: the focal point of the challenge between euthanasia and philosophy of ethics and human rights. Iran J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2011; 4 (1 and 2) :1-8

URL: http://ijme.tums.ac.ir/article-1-185-fa.html

13.          Tavakkoli SN. A Comparative Study of Passive Voluntary Euthanasia in Kantian Deontological Ethics and Islamic Virtue Ethics. 2011. (In Persian).

14.          Thomasma DC, Pellegrino ED. Philosophy of medicine as the source for medical ethics. Metamedicine. 1981 Feb;2(1):5-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00886339.

15.          Jansen LA, Sulmasy DP. Proportionality, terminal suffering and the restorative goals of medicine. Theor Med Bioeth. 2002;23(4-5):321-37. doi: 10.1023/a:1021209706566.

16.          Callahan D, Parens E. The ends of medicine: shaping new goals. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1995 Summer;72(1):95-117.

17.          Allert G, Blasszauer B, Boyd K, Callahan D. The goals of medicine: setting new priorities. The Hastings Center Report. 1996;26(6). doi:S1. 10.1007/s11571-024-10144-7

18.          Patuzzo S, Pulice E, Orsi L. Palliative Care against Medically Assisted Death? Misunderstanding and Instrumental Objections. The American journal of hospice & palliative care. 2024;41(8):853-8.

19.          Donaldson T. Human flourishing, the goals of medicine and integration of palliative care considerations into intensive care decision-making. J Med Ethics. 2024 Jul 23;50(8):539-543. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109299.

20.          Chochinov HM, Fins JJ. Is Medical Assistance in Dying Part of Palliative Care? JAMA. 2024 Sep 11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.12088. Epub ahead of print

21.          Shahriari H. Philosophy of Ethics. Encyclopedia of Islamic Medical Ethics. 2025;1(1):1-16.

22.          Hosseini MH. An Analysis of the Reductio ad Absurdum Argument in Classical and Modern Logical Systems. Scientific-Research Journal of the Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, University of Isfahan. 2001;2(24–25):59–72. (In Persian).

23.          Liu A, Murray M, Pease E. Language, Proof and Logic. Edition David Barker-plummer, Barwise J,  Etchemendy J. 2011.

24.          Sadeghi M. The Role of Thought Experiments in Philosophy. Metaphysics. 2019;11(28):67–80. (In Persian)

25.          Gendler T. Thought Experiment: on the powers and limits of imaginary cases. Garland publishing, Inc. 2000.

26.          Ieodiakonou Kr, S. Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts. BRILL. 2007.

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us